Smoking ban argument

Con brings the principle of Personal Liberty into the mix. However, this tactic has not been successful yet.

In any argumentative essay, the writer should be able to show the contradicting views of people. This is a proof that smoking is an addictive habit, and it is not easy to stop. Consider if you would the reality that by Smoking ban argument harmful substances like tobacco to be legal, our society has monetized a human life.

However, as the law stands, there is a lot to be done to discourage the habit. One main reason which makes the total prohibition impossible is that the use of tobacco generates a lot of revenues to many countries.

The question is, is the Smoking ban argument state so wrong? In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. Governments raise enormous amounts of tax on cigarette sales, hundreds of thousands of people work in the cigarette industry directly and millions indirectly.

Until con presents a clear demonstration of the harms, it remains that the harm of smoking outweighs the harm of gangs. One of these factors is the laws and regulations that govern any country. Thank you Tashjar for your argument. The evidence of harm to non-smokers on the beach Smoking ban argument in a park from someone smoking is virtually non-existent.

So long as we stop making smoking look cool for the young, essays will do so much in convincing people to quit the habit. Essentially Con argues against smoking bans by referencing the money made. It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support.

One can also add the major economic consequences of smoking and not smoking. However, despite the seeming rationality standing behind these measures, smoking bans are in fact much less fair than it is usually considered.

What good is a wealthy society void of justice that allows 41, people to be killed by others annually? The third argument, and the most interesting argument to me, was that parents and families have the right to take their kids to the beach, or a park, without seeing anyone smoke.

Still, many smokers are willing to pay an extra penny to get a little puff for their satisfaction. Many people write about this topic aiming to discourage people who smoke.

But who and what are these bans meant to protect? Public attention to the problem of smoking cigarettes remains significant; in addition, smoking has undergone radical controlling measures, such as bans from numerous healthcare and governmental organizations.

The essay should not consider only one side of the debate, as this is a major clash between millions of people and governments worldwide.

What started you down this road? This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development. Talk shows have gone as far as to bring guest speakers who are reformed smokers to give a smoking speech or their account on the adverse effects of smoking.

It would be entirely impossible to fight cigarette smoking as long as it remains legal within our laws. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. In addition, smoking bans are sometimes imposed in an anti-democratic way, as it has happened in Great Britain, where a total ban had been imposed regardless of significant opposition.

They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice.

Smoking Ban

You find a lot of emotional and compelling smoking argumentative essay papers on the web. The Harm Principle proposed by John Stuart Mill states that "That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.

The evidence that fish and birds are dying because of cigarette butts is virtually non-existent. Thanks for having me. I discovered the evidence was really weak. The relevant authorities try to stop tobacco smoking by increasing the tax amounts on cigarettes so that smokers find it expensive.

SHOULD CIGARETTE SMOKING BE BANNED?

Strict laws should be in place to counter this habit. The reason is that some people may argue that smoking in public places has no negative effects that warrant its ban, while others may argue out that smoking in public places is so bad and dangerous that governments should ban it completely in towns.For instance, in the argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer should explain what the consequences are for not setting up smoking zones.

The reason is that some people may argue that smoking in public places has no negative effects that warrant its ban, while others may argue out that smoking in public places is so bad.

SHOULD CIGARETTE SMOKING BE BANNED? Essay sample by my essay writing com. Introduction. Arguments for and against Ban on Cigarette Smoking. The case for an outright ban on cigarette smoking seems to be very strong.

However, there are those who argue to the contrary. Those who argue against a ban on cigarette smoking. The Case Against Smoking Bans THOMAS A.

LAMBERT I University of Missouri–Columbia School of Law The argument above concludes that smoking bans are unnec-essary because market processes will ensure either that patrons’ and employees’ preferences regarding smoking are.

What kind of arguments one can suggest to prove that smoking should be banned in bars, restaurants and all other public places? No more second-hand smoking!

The Real Reason Behind Public Smoking Bans

It is a well-known fact that second-hand smoking is one of the cancer causes. A smoking ban would negate or at least mitigate the damage done to society in this way. I leave this contention with a few questions. What good is a job if you are not alive or healthy enough to work? - Smoking Ban Argument Have you ever been in your favorite restaurant and just as you are about to take a bite of your favorite dish, your lungs are filled with a cloud of smoke which has drifted to your table from the smoking section just a few feet away.

This is a common complaint of many patrons who enjoy dining at restaurants.

Arguments Against Smoking Bans Download
Smoking ban argument
Rated 5/5 based on 64 review